HD 145622 V = 5.730 [0.009] Lab Manual V: lambda=.55 um, Delta lambda=.09 um, F0=3.75E-8 W/m^2 um diameter pupil .005 m * @constants.cal * set lambda=.55e-6 deltaL=.09 F0=3.75E-8 V=5.73 * ? F0*10^(-V/2.5) .1914393749907772E-09 !W/(m^2 um) * ? res/(h*c/lambda) 530050479.9260179 !#/(s m^2 um) * ? res*deltaL 47704543.19334161 !#/(s m^2) * ? res*pi/4*(.005)^2 936.6765152441187 !#/s solid angles are measured in steradians=area/R^2 The small image square, while flat, can be considered (by radian measure) a spherical area (theta*R)^2, and so a solid angle of theta^2 4 Pi steradians in a sphere, so N=4*pi/(28/60*pi/180)^2 * ? 4*pi/(28/60*pi/180)^2 189426.8628799864 FYI: google says there are 41253 square degrees in a sphere and we got apprx 4x that At mag=5.5 I reported 2,822 stars and #6 says for every mag deeper you get 4x more 2,822*4^x=189426 4^x=189426/2,822 x*log(4)=log(189426/2,822) ? log(res/2822)/log(4) 3.034389568845798 so to get about N stars you need to go to mag 8.5 http://www.stargazing.net/david/constel/howmanystars.html The density of stars on a sphere of radius R would be: 2822/4 pi R^2 = 1/(D^2 sin(pi/3)) (D/R)^2=4 pi/(2822 sin(pi/3)) radian theta=D/R=sqrt(4 pi/(2822 sin(pi/3))) ? sqrt(4*pi/(2822*sin(pi/3)))*180/pi 4.108504281235549 !(degrees, seems big too me) Swihart chapter 6: #5 & #6 consider N stars/volume each of absolute magnitude M All the stars inside radius r would be brighter than apparent m, where m-M=5 log(r/10) 10^((m-M)/5)*10=r 10^(m+1-M)/5)=r by Eq 6.4-2: M=4.77-2.5 log(L) 10^(m/5+1-4.77/5+.5*log(L))=r 10^(m/5+.046+.5*log(L))=r as: 1-4.77/5=.046 #6 for any fixed value of L, a huge cancelation occurs for r(m+1)/r(m): r(m+1)/r(m)=10^.2 so n(m+1)/n(m)=(r(m+1)/r(m))^3=10^.6=3.98 * ? 10^.6 3.981071705534972 Now what if we have two different classes of stars, for one star n(m+1)/n(m)=4/1 for the other n(m+1)/n(m)=12/3 note if we look at totals: n(m+1)/n(m)=(4+12)/(1+3)=16/4=4 more generally if we have N classes of star labelled by i and we have for each class: n(m+1)_i = f*n(m)_i where f is a fixed value, then total (m+1)=sum[ n(m+1)_i ] = f*sum[ n(m)_i ] total (m) = sum[ n(m)_i ] clearly the ratio is still f